THE CASE FOR URGENT CANADIAN SELF-DETERMINATION AND SUBSEQUENT DECOLONIZATION

CANADA HAS THE RIGHT TO BECOME AN IMMEDIATE SELF-DETERMINED NATION AND A SUBSEQUENT RIGHT TO ACTUALLY DECOLONIZE!

Foreign powers were written into the constitution of Canada. 

Let's take a look at that and see what we can do in response:

BRITISH NORTH AMERICA ACT - 1867

Whereas the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick have expressed their Desire to be federally united into One Dominion under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, with a Constitution similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom:

And whereas such a Union would conduce to the Welfare of the Provinces and promote the Interests of the British Empire:

And whereas on the Establishment of the Union by Authority of Parliament it is expedient, not only that the Constitution of the Legislative Authority in the Dominion be provided for, but also that the Nature of the Executive Government therein be declared (...)

PROBLEM 1:

THE CONSTITUTION WAS WRITTEN TO PROMOTE THE BEST INTEREST OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE.

PROBLEM 2:

EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE, SPECIFICALLY THE CABINET AND ITS COMMITTEE, THE TREASURY BOARD OF CANADA, IS UNQUESTIONABLY DECEPTIVE, ARBITRARY AND OUT OF CONTROL!

AS SUCH, LIFE, LIBERTY AND SECURITY OF PERSON IN CANADA APPEARS TO BE AT RISK DESPITE THE SO-CALLED CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES. 

STATUTE OF WESTMINSTER - 1931

WHEREAS the delegates of His Majesty's Governments in the United Kingdom, the Dominion of Canada, the Commonwealth of Australia, the Dominion of New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, the Irish Free State and Newfoundland, at Imperial Conferences holden at Westminster in the years of our Lord nineteen hundred and twenty-six and nineteen hundred and thirty did concur in making the declarations and resolutions set forth in the Reports of the said Conferences:

And whereas it is meet and proper to set out by way of preamble to this Act that, inasmuch as the Crown is the symbol of the free association of the members of the British Commonwealth of Nations, and as they are united by a common allegiance to the Crown, it would be in accord with the established constitutional position of all the members of the Commonwealth in relation to one another that any alteration in the law touching the Succession to the Throne or the Royal Style and Titles shall hereafter require the assent as well of the Parliaments of all the Dominions as of the Parliament of the United Kingdom (...)

PROBLEM:

THE BRITISH EMPIRE CLANDESTINELY TRANSFORMED INTO THE COMMONWEALTH OF NATIONS AND WAS UPDATED AS SUCH IN THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION. 

DECLARATION ON THE GRANTING OF INDEPENDENCE TO COLONIAL COUNTRIES AND PEOPLES - UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 1514 - DECEMBER 14, 1960

The General Assembly ,

Mindful of the determination proclaimed by the peoples of the world in the Charter of the United Nations to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Conscious of the need for the creation of conditions of stability and well-being and peaceful and friendly relations based on respect for the principles of equal rights and self-determination of all peoples, and of universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion,

Recognizing the passionate yearning for freedom in all dependent peoples and the decisive role of such peoples in the attainment of their independence,

Aware of the increasing conflicts resulting from the denial of or impediments in the way of the freedom of such peoples, which constitute a serious threat to world peace,

Considering the important role of the United Nations in assisting the movement for independence in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories,

Recognizing that the peoples of the world ardently desire the end of colonialism in all its manifestations,

Convinced that the continued existence of colonialism prevents the development of international economic co-operation, impedes the social, cultural and economic development of dependent peoples and militates against the United Nations ideal of universal peace,

Affirming that peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law,

Believing that the process of liberation is irresistible and irreversible and that, in order to avoid serious crises, an end must be put to colonialism and all practices of segregation and discrimination associated therewith,

Welcoming the emergence in recent years of a large number of dependent territories into freedom and independence, and recognizing the increasingly powerful trends towards freedom in such territories which have not yet attained independence,

Convinced that all peoples have an inalienable right to complete freedom, the exercise of their sovereignty and the integrity of their national territory,

Solemnly proclaims the necessity of bringing to a speedy and unconditional end colonialism in all its forms and manifestations;

And to this end

Declares that:

The subjection of peoples to alien subjugation, domination and exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights, is contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and is an impediment to the promotion of world peace and co-operation.

All peoples have the right to self-determination; by virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

Inadequacy of political, economic, social or educational preparedness should never serve as a pretext for delaying independence.

All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise peacefully and freely their right to complete independence, and the integrity of their national territory shall be respected.

Immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or colour, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and freedom.

Any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.

All States shall observe faithfully and strictly the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the present Declaration on the basis of equality, non-interference in the internal affairs of all States, and respect for the sovereign rights of all peoples and their territorial integrity.

SOURCE

PROBLEM: 

DECOLONIZATION HAS NOT OCCURRED. 

INSTEAD, THE BRITISH HIGH COMMISSION WAS PUT IN PLACE UNDER THE GUISE OF DECOLONIZATION TO FACILITATE CLANDESTINE ONGOING, NEO OR INTERNAL COLONIALISM. 

HIGH COMMISSIONER

"In the British Empire (most of the territories of which became the Commonwealth), high commissioners were envoys of the Imperial government appointed to manage protectorates or groups of territories not fully under the sovereignty of the British Crown, while Crown colonies (British sovereign territories) were normally administered by a governor, and the most significant possessions, large confederations and the self-governing dominions were headed by a governor-general.

The British government continued not to appoint high commissioners to the Dominions, holding that the British government was already represented by the relevant governor-general or governor. This arrangement began to create problems after the First World War with Dominions expecting a greater degree of control over their external and foreign affairs and beginning to challenge the constitutional role of their governors-general. In Canada, matters came to a head during the King–Byng affair of 1926, when the governor-general refused the advice of the Canadian prime minister to dissolve parliament and call elections, as would normally apply under the Westminster system. The incident led to the Balfour Declaration made at the Imperial Conference of 1926 that established that governors-general in the independent Dominions were not the representatives of the United Kingdom government but the personal representatives of the monarch. In 1930, Australia broke another tradition by insisting that the monarch act on the advice of the Australian prime minister in the appointment of the governor-general, and insisted on the appointment of Sir Isaac Isaacs, the first Australian-born person to serve in the office. The practice became the norm throughout the Commonwealth. The first British high commissioner to a dominion was appointed in 1928 to Canada. South Africa received a British high commissioner in 1930; Australia in 1936; and New Zealand in 1939.

The term is used across all 56 member states of the Commonwealth of Nations, as diplomatic relations between these countries are traditionally at a governmental level rather than at the Head of State level, as is otherwise common. This is because traditionally these Commonwealth states shared a head of state, the Monarch of the United Kingdom (currently Charles III). In diplomatic usage, a high commissioner is considered equivalent in rank and role to an ambassador, and carries the full title of "High Commissioner Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary".

A high commissioner from one Commonwealth state to another carries a simple and often informal letter of introduction from one head of government (prime minister) to that of another, host country, while ambassadors carry formal letters of credence from their head of state addressed to the host country's head of state. The difference in accreditation is also reflected in the formal titles of envoys to Commonwealth and non-Commonwealth states: e.g., British high commissioners to the Commonwealth countries are formally titled "The High Commissioner for His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom", whereas British ambassadors to non-Commonwealth countries are known as "His Britannic Majesty's Ambassador".

Despite the differences in terminology, Commonwealth high commissioners have, since 1948, enjoyed the same diplomatic rank and precedence as ambassadors of foreign heads of state, and in some countries are accorded privileges not enjoyed by foreign ambassadors. For example, the British Sovereign receives high commissioners before ambassadors, and sends a coach and four horses to fetch new high commissioners to the palace, whereas new ambassadors get only two horses. High commissioners also attend important ceremonies of state, such as the annual Remembrance Sunday service at The Cenotaph in Whitehall (commemorating Commonwealth war dead) and royal weddings and funerals."

SOURCE

GOVERNOR GENERAL VS. HIGH COMMISSIONER

"In addition, the Balfour Declaration also held that the governor general would cease to act as the representative of the British government. Accordingly, in 1928, the United Kingdom appointed its first High Commissioner to Canada thus effectively ending the governor general's diplomatic role as the British government's envoy."

SOURCE

BRITISH HIGH COMMISSION

"The High Commissioner's position was created in 1928 after the Balfour Declaration of 1926 and was the first such posting for Britain. The present High Commissioner is Rob Tinline. The UK has Consulates-General in Toronto, Montreal, Calgary, and Vancouver. It has Honorary Consuls in St. John's, Halifax, Quebec City, and Winnipeg. The High Commission also represents the British Overseas Territories in Canada.

The High Commissioner resides at Earnscliffe, a mansion on the Ottawa River.

In 2019, the UK Government announced a new building would be constructed for the High Commission, on property next to Earnscliffe. The new building opened 04 September 2024.

The former High Commission building at 80 Elgin Street, was sold to the National Capital Commission in 2022 and is now under renovation. The building was opened in 1964 and designed by Eric Bedford. Previously the site had been home to the Union Hotel, founded in the 1850s but demolished in 1962."

SOURCE

PROBLEM:

COMMISSIONERS IN CANADA DOUBLE AS DEPUTY MINISTERS AND OTHER CLANDESTINE GOVERNMENT AGENTS

FOR EXAMPLE: BOB HAMILITON = CRA COMMISSIONER; CRA CEO & DEPUTY COMMISSIONER. 

DEPUTY MINISTERS ARE AGENCY HEADS. 

DEPUTY MINISTERS THEORECTICALLY REPORT TO ELECTED MINISTERS WHO ARE ACCOUNTABLE TO PARLIMANET. IF DEPUTY MINISTERS FAIL TO MAKE TIMELY OR ACCURATE REPORTS TO THE MINISTER ACCOUNTABILITY BECOMES LOST. 

BELOW, WE SEE THAT THIS IS A CURRENT PROBLEM!

PROBLEM: CLANDESTINE AGENTS HAVE BEEN GRANTED DELEGATED AUTHORITY AND ARE UNACCOUNTABLE TO PARLIAMENT AND THE PEOPLE OF CANADA! CRA COMMISSIONER EXERCISES POWERS DELEGATED BY THE MINISTER, AS WE SEE BELOW:

DELEGATED PARLIAMENTARY AUTHORITY

"While delegation of powers between levels of government is constitutionally prohibited, there is no prohibition against delegating powers to a subordinate body. Parliament and the provincial legislatures may delegate lawmaking powers to entities such as the executive branch of government and bodies of their own creation, like administrative boards and tribunals. Delegates must act within the limits of the authority delegated by Parliament or a provincial legislature. Delegated power is subordinate and can be withdrawn.

Parliament and provincial legislatures are able to delegate broad powers. For example, in 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada held in References re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act that Parliament constitutionally delegated broad powers to the executive branch in the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (“GGPPA”). The GGPPA exemplifies the breadth of powers that Parliament can delegate to the executive branch. The powers delegated by Parliament in the GGPPA include the power of the Governor in Council (i.e. the federal Cabinet) to determine whether provincial greenhouse gas pricing systems are sufficiently stringent. Parliament also assigned the Minister of the Environment the power to designate a facility (upon request by the facility) as a “covered facility,” thus subjecting it to the regulatory charges found in Part 2 of the GGPPA. This decision affirms the legislature’s power to make broad delegations of powers to the executive branch."

SOURCE

A CLANDESTINE, PARALLEL SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT 

HAS BEEN DEVELOPED IN CANADA

(Please don't be overwhelmed by the following complicated images. Understanding this clandestine structure can take significant time & patience)

PROBLEM: PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE A SIMILAR STRUCTRE. MUNCIPALITIES ARE CURRENTLY BEING REDESIGNED WITH NEW STRUCTURES OF GOVERNMENT THAT INCLUDE CEO'S, CAO'S, INTEGRITY COMMISSIONERS, ETC. 

PROBLEM: ALL OF THIS NONSENSE TRACES BACK TO THE VERY COMPLICATED STRUCTURE OF THE U.K GOVERNMENT. PLEASE NOTE HOW THE U.K PRIME MINISTER DOUBLES AS THE FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY. THE INFAMOUS 10 DOWNING STREET IS HOME TO THE FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY, NOT THE PRIME MINISTER. 

THE PRIME MINISTER'S ROLE WAS DESIGNED BY ROBERT WALPOLE WHILE HE WAS SERVING AS THE FIRST LORD OF THE TREAUSRY WHICH IS CURRENTLY A POSITION WITHIN THE GREAT OFFICES OF STATE. 

THERE IS A SIMILAR SYSTEM AT PLAY WHEREBY THE U.K MINISTER OF JUSTICE (CROWN OFFICE) DOUBLES AS THE LORD HIGH CHANCELLOR WITHIN THE SYSTEM OF THE GREAT OFFICERS OF STATE. 

THE GREAT OFFICES OF STATE APPEAR TO BE DISMANTLING THE GREAT OFFICERS OF STATE, WHICH IS THE TRADITIONAL CROWN SYSTEM, AND REPLACING IT WITH THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM THAT'S LOCKED AND READY TO ROLL. 

THE TRICK TO IT ALL IS THAT THE SO-CALLED CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH  OR SO-CALLED KING, CURRENTLY CHARLES III, ACTS NOT ONLY AS THE 'CROWN' BUT ALSO AS THE HEAD OF THE COMMONWEALTH. THEREFORE, GOING FROM THE CROWN SYSTEM TO THE COMMONWEALTH WOULDN'T BE SO DIFFICULT TO PULL OFF, ESPECIALLY WHILE THE MAJORITY OF CANADIANS REMAIN UNINFORMED ABOUT THE DUAL SYSTEM AND THE NATURE OF THE COMMONWEALTH AND EXECUTIVE FUNCTION OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

THE CHANGE FROM DOMINION DAY TO CANADA DAY AND  EMPIRE DAY TO COMMONWEALTH DAY IS TELLING OF THE CALCULATED CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN SLOWLY OCCURING OVER TIME. 

THE CURRENT FOREIGN OFFICE, FORMALLY KNOWN AS THE FOREIGN, COMMONWEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT OFFICE (FCDO), IS THE FORMER COLONIAL AND DOMINIONS OFFICE THAT THE BRITISH HIGH COMMISSION IS ATTACHED TO. THE WAR DEPARTMENT AND THE BOARD OF TRADE, ALSO EMBEDDED INTO THE COMPLEX U.K GOVERNMENT SET-UP HAVE SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED CANADA-U.K RELATIONS SINCE CANADA'S EARLIEST DAYS AS A DEVELOPING NATION.

SELF DETERMINATION - UNITED NATIONS

"Whereas the right of peoples and nations to self-determination is a prerequisite to the full enjoyment of all fundamental human rights, Whereas the Charter of the United Nations, under Articles 1 and 55, aims to develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the equal rights and self-determination of peoples in order to strengthen universal peace, Whereas the Charter of the United Nations recognizes that certain Members of the United Nations are responsible for the administration of Territories whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure of self-government, and affirms the principles which should guide them, Whereas every Member of the United Nations, in conformity with the Charter, should respect the maintenance of the right of self-determination in other States, The General Assembly recommends that:

1. The States Members of the United Nations shall uphold the principle of self-determination of all peoples and nations;

2. The States Members of the United Nations shall recognize and promote the realization of the right of self-determination of the peoples of Non-Self -Governing and Trust Territories who are under their administration and shall facilitate the exercise of this right by the peoples of such Territories according to the principles and spirit of the Charter of the United Nations in regard to each Territory and to the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned, the wishes of the people being ascertained through plebiscites or other recognized democratic means, preferably under the auspices of the United Nations;

3. The States Members of the United Nations responsible for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories shall take practical steps, pending the realization of the right of self-determination and in preparation thereof, to ensure the direct participation of the indigenous populations in the legislative and executive organs of government of those Territories, and to prepare them for complete self-government or independence."

SOURCE

PROBLEM: EVEN IF THE HIGH COMMISSION WEREN'T AN ISSUE, THE GOVERNOR GENERAL AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNORS REPRESENT THE CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH AND ACT ON THE MONARCH'S BEHALF. THIS IS NOT INLINE WITH A SOVEREIGN, SELF-DETERMINED NATION. 

AT THE SAME TIME, AN ARBITRARY, UNACCOUNTABLE EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT THAT OPERATES THROUGH THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE, LETTERS PATENT, OTHER STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS AND SUBSEQUENT DELEGATED POWERS IS IN SERVICE TO CHARLES III, AN UNDENIABLY FOREIGN INFLUENCE. (Albeit there may be discrepancy in 'foreign influence' with his 'Canadian Crown' status whereupon equitable doctrine cancels out deceptive and coercive tactics.)

WHILE THE GOVERNOR GENERAL AND LIUETENANT GOVERNORS ARE IN SERVICE TO CHARLES III, THE HIGH COMMISSION IS IN SERVICE TO THE U.K GOVERNMENT. 

AT ANY RATE, THE EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA IS IN SERVICE TO FOREIGN AGENTS. 

AS SUCH, CANADA CAN'T POSSIBLY BE CONSIDERED TO BE A FREE, SELF-DETERMINED OR SOVEREIGN NATION.

FURTHER, ECONOMIC IMPERIALISM IS A FORM OF ONGOING COLONIZATION AND IT'S OCCURRING HERE IN CANADA. COLONIALISM IN ALL FORMS IS ULAWFUL AND CANADA IS MANDATED TO DECOLONIZE.

AT PRESENT, THE EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT HAS THE POWER TO ENTER INTO TREATIES AND TO GO TO WAR WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF PARLIAMENT. SOURCE

SOLUTION

CANADA MUST BEGIN THE ACTUAL PROCESS OF DECOLONIZATION NOW.

THROUGHOUT THE INEVITABLE SELF-DETERMINATION TRANSITION AND THE SUBSEQUENT DECOLONIZATION PROCESS , LET IT BE RECALLED THAT:

"ALL ARMED ACTION OR REPRESSIVE MEASURES OF ALL KINDS DIRECTED AGAINST DEPENDENT PEOPLES SHALL CEASE IN ORDER TO ENABLE THEM TOO EXERCISE PEACEFULLY AND FREELY THEIR RIGHT TO COMPLET INDEPENDENCE AND THE INTEGRITY OF THEIR NATIONAL TERRITORY SHALL BE RESPECTED"

 - U.N CHARTER

POWER TO THE PEOPLE!

holisticus.ca

*The author considers a potential relationship between Canada and the United Nations for the purpose of achieving self-determination and subsequent decolonization but then pulling out of the U.N Agenda for Sustainability as soon as possible thereafter. Despite the author's opinion, any choice on the future of Canada, in all reality and at the end of the day, rests, as it should, on the Canadian collective!